Op 16-12-14 om 16:15 schreef Jape Person: > On 12/16/2014 09:55 AM, Curt wrote: >> On 2014-12-16, Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflyby...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I noticed gnash was installed as a lightspark dependency so, after >>> having problems with lightspark, I backed up and just focused on >>> seeing if I couldn't finally get gnash operational. Took a tiny bit of >>> manual file manipulation to get my browser to recognize its existence. >>> As of this second, it's working in both Opera and chromium-browser. >>> >> >> I've never heard of lightspark. I installed gnash once a few years ago >> and I did gnash (my teeth). >> >> What is your definition of the word "working?" >> > > Heh. I'd take gnash right now. > > I just can't bring myself to install the nonfree flash. (I've had a hard > enough time convincing myself that it's okay to install non-free drivers > and the BIOS firmware update packages.)
Look good when you buy hardware. I don't use non-free drivers, that's not a big problem. But sometimes I use non-free firmware and microcode. > Gnash disappeared from testing a little while ago, and the lightspark > plugin doesn't play anything, anywhere, ever for me. > > Makes me happy that html5 is beginning to catch on. > > I agree that gnash was pretty frumpy, but I could at least play videos > at youtube. Not sure what folks using Jessie are supposed to do for > flash besides go nonfree. Most sites, including Youtube, are working fine with HTML5. With regards, Paul. > Sorry for the slight off-topic rant. > > ;-) > > -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54905eab.8080...@vandervlis.nl
