It's the way you look at. For me it's about prevention...your child can click on some link somewhere and see some pictures/videos which will remain in his/her mind (let's say) forever and can harm even if it was only seconds they were seen...I am speaking about children less than 15 years old...and even older children needs protection.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sascha Steinmann (adremes GmbH & Co KG) < steinm...@adremes.com> wrote: > I agree 100% with Reco. > Don't use technical Stuff to protect your children. > Learn them to use their Brain, to protect their self. > It's the most important thing, when u sit in front of a Computer. > When u want to block adult content u have to block 80% of the entire > visible web. > And you will spend your evenings to make your blacklists up2date. > Greetings > Sascha > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Reco [mailto:recovery...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. März 2015 13:52 > An: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Betreff: Re: Redirect HTTPS with Squid3+Squidguard > > Hi. > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:21:57 +0100 > Peter Viskup <skupko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > just jumped into SSLBump/Split features some months ago. I don't find > > these features harmful. Especially when protecting your children from > > access of YouTube or other possibly harmful sites. Once you are logged > > with Google account they redirect your communication to https which > > makes the inspection not possible. The Squid's SSLBump/Split (whose > > name in latest version SslPeekAndSplice) is the only feature which > > will make the inspection happen. This means there are still some cases > > where this feature is very helpful and the only one freely available. > > If you're considering that spying on your own children is a good idea - I > don't even know what to say. They solve such problems here by educating > children, not limiting their internet access. Besides, if a child would > really want to bypass such access control - he or she will find a way > sooner or later (hint - a cellphone, for instance). > > The only good usage of SSL Bump in my book is reverse-engineering certain > proprietary applications. > > Recp > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/20150326155150.246957029666332067526...@gmail.com > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/f6da57c02758bb41bf462233ad62bf9265836...@ex10mbox1e.hosting.inetserver.de > >
