Hello Reco, On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi. > And just as well child can see a naughty picture on TV. Or a phone ad. > Or a magazine/newspaper. Anywhere, once you start thinking about it. > And that's just sad, disturbingly and one of the main reasons of so many people facing porn addiction. Whatever damage is done depends on child's state of mind, which is > influenced by his/her prior education. Which, for the most part, should > be (IMO) provided by parents first, and society (friends, school, > whatever) - second. > First would recommend you to read something about the psychology of children. And internet censorship is not a substitute of education. The only > thing that censorship can teach is how to workaround it. Or that one's > parents are complete <insert_some_profanity_here>. Is that how you want > your children to perceive you? > >From this point of view all aspects of parenting are censorship. It's not about the government internet censorship - differentiate between parenting and freedom protection and well - I didn't tell the education is not needed. > Besides, what's up with this 15 years mark? > Just as an example - no other meaning, everybody can choose its own number. ;-) My last sentence to this thread - read "The Little Prince" a lot and once you will understand what's all this about probably and then you will be ready for reading Citadelle. Yes - I know - too much pathetic for somebody...
