On Friday 11 September 2015 22:01:11 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 10-09-15 om 23:57 schreef Lisi Reisz: > > On Thursday 10 September 2015 13:37:03 Brian wrote: > >>> Nonetheless, flashplayer-mozilla works on my desktop and > >>> flashplugin-nonfree doesn't. FOR THIS SPECIFIC CHANNEL. > >> > >> Intriguing. Are the HAL packages installed? > > > > All the ones you mention plus hal-trinity. But so has my husband's > > computer. He has only the one libflashplayer.so, the mozilla one. > > > > I, on the other hand, have three: > > /home/lisi/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so > > /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so > > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so > > > > Plus two actually on my computer in some old files belonging to a client. > > The correct place is: > /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so > It's important to remove the other ones. > > > Reported in iceweasel thus: > > <quote> > > File: libflashplayer.so,libflashplayer.so,libflashplayer.so > > > > Path: > > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so,/usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/l > >ibflashplayer.so,/home/lisi/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so Version: > > 11.2.202.350 > > State: Enabled (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) > > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 > > </quote> > > And then a table. > > > > My husband has: > > <quote> > > File: libflashplayer.so > > Path: /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so > > Version: 11.2.202.508 > > State: Enabled > > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 > > </quote> > > Your husband has the correct version for Iceweasel. You are using an old > version. > > But it's better to use Chromium, it has version 18.0.0.209.
Paul, I am trying to do something specific that you are completely ignoring. I am certainly not going to touch anything at all on the computer that is working. And Chromium DOES NOR WORK WITH CHANNEL 4. Lisi