On Tuesday 13 October 2015 19:37:34 Brian wrote: > On Tue 13 Oct 2015 at 13:12:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 October 2015 04:57:07 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > > > On Mon, October 12, 2015 9:16 pm, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > Use PDF instead of PS. That's the fool-proof method, and you get the > > > > advantages of the PDF specification. > > > > > > > > [It's also probably time to move away from pdflatex to xelatex or > > > > some other LaTeX engine with real utf8 support.] > > > > > > Thanks for bringing up the utf8 issue; I keep forgetting about it. > > > > > > But is the PDF file I produce with whatever is in Jessie likely to be > > > readable by Windows XP or Vista? I ask this because I have an older HP > > > laserjet which cannot decipher Postscript Level 3. > > > > Surely the whole point of .pdf is that it is an open standard which > > is "universal"? And it has traditionally been easier to make use of from > > Windows than from Linux. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Document_Format > > Try downloading this document and reading it with mupdf (or a Linux > viewer of your choice). > > wget > https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/3 >73943/nrl1i.pdf > > There may be an ISO standard for a PDF but not all PDF's conform to the > standard. Don't forget: standards are good; everyone can have one. :)
:-) > I have a clear recollection of your having met this and asking about it > on debian-user. Yes, but it is usually soluble, and anyway, I thought that pdf was easier from Windows. It used to be. But I haven't used Windows for a very long time, so I may easily be wrong. Lisi