On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:53:39 +0000, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 November 2015 04:06:49 moxalt wrote: > > I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but really > > guys? 'Should'? > > Oh dear! lets all weep. "Outsider"? What on earth are you talking about? > Why are you an outsider anymore than anyone else? > > It isn't the word that is the problem per se. It is your attitude that you > should (sic) be able to dictate to everybody else and your unpleasantness to > anyone who disagrees with you over this issue. Who are you to dictate who > may or may not listen to what radio station over what medium? > > > > * Of course there is the difference between "You should avoid punching me > > > in the nose" and "You should use only FLOSS". > > > > Not really. Both are actions I would engage in, and would like others to do > > the same. I never thought the word 'should' was such a big issue. > > It isn't per se. It is what it means that is the problem. > > Lisi > Let's put this all in context, shall we? Here's my original statement, the one which gave rise to a shitstorm spanning over 36 posts (correct me if I'm wrong): > And I believe OP should do neither. Disproportionate much?