On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:53:39 +0000, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Saturday 21 November 2015 04:06:49 moxalt wrote:
> > I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but really
> > guys? 'Should'?  
> 
> Oh dear!  lets all weep.  "Outsider"?  What on earth are you talking about?  
> Why are you an outsider anymore than anyone else?
> 
> It isn't the word that is the problem per se.  It is your attitude that you 
> should (sic) be able to dictate to everybody else and your unpleasantness to 
> anyone who disagrees with you over this issue.  Who are you to dictate who 
> may or may not listen to what radio station over what medium?
> 
> > > * Of course there is the difference between "You should avoid punching me
> > > in the nose" and "You should use only FLOSS".  
> >
> > Not really. Both are actions I would engage in, and would like others to do
> > the same. I never thought the word 'should' was such a big issue.  
> 
> It isn't per se.  It is what it means that is the problem.
> 
> Lisi
> 

Let's put this all in context, shall we? Here's my original statement, the one
which gave rise to a shitstorm spanning over 36 posts (correct me if I'm wrong):

> And I believe OP should do neither.

Disproportionate much?

Reply via email to