On Fri 01 Jul 2016 at 16:57:02 +0000, Curt wrote: > On 2016-07-01, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2016 17:39:57 Curt wrote: > >> > > Because then the answer might be private too, and this is a public thread. > > I > > would obviously be interested in the answer, and many others might be too. > > > > Not to mention that it would be useful for the archives and that Henrique > > might not want to be bothered privately. > > That's not what I meant. I meant ask *him* *here* in this public thread why > ... > etc.
He is a subscriber to -user. By definition he *has been* asked here in this public thread. > I thought that was clear. I hope the above is clear. Whether he chooses to reply is up to him. You obviously have no reply of any consequence to give.
