On 2016-09-28 10:46 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Vincent Lefevre writes: > > Things like that should not happen. But this is not a bug in the perl > > packages. This is a misfeature of apt / aptitude, which want to remove > > packages instead of holding the new packages (well, AFAIK, aptitude > > has improved, but is still not perfect). > > Aptitude can't read your mind. When you tell it to install > something it assumes that you mean what you say and proposes > solutions to any conflicts based on various heuristics.
When there's some kind of conflict during a package installation or upgrade, the first solutions proposed by aptitude almost invariably involve large numbers of package removals. The simple solution that upgrades/installs what can be and leaves the rest alone is usually there but buried under at least three -- and sometimes tens of -- very disruptive ones. If aptitude got it wrong half the time, it might be for want of reading minds. But in my experience it gets it consistently wrong. Suggests to me that what it needs is new heuristics. -- André Majorel <http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/> Ever got spam through an address harvested from bugs.debian.org ? Neither have I.