-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Amm wrote: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:49:17 -0000 (UTC) > Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> wrote: > >> Glenn English wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> wrote: >> > >> >> I take it you're on ipv6, right; and not perchance dualstack? >> > >> > Sorry. Should have mentioned that I'm one of those v4 only folks. My >> > ISP wants more $$ for v6 IPs. (Doesn't make any sense to me either.) >> > >> > I've thought v6/4 might be the problem. Is spamhaus v6 only? I don't >> > see any mention of that on their web site... >> >> No, but you're getting v6 responses in those lookups, so *something* >> thinks it's supposed to be using v6. >> > > Seems not related to IPv6 or dual stack: > > [...]
Indeed, it resulted the same for me. Perhaps they (or their DNS provider) goofed something. DDG doesn't show anything that it's been discontinued in the first page of results, so it's probably not that it's been done away with. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJaNmy6AAoJEI4R3fMSeaKBFWIIAKJchFJzAJurZjLYolUnToYu Xz4WQcm2pJ8DbLRSuqs+WN9J2hVAEmIGOkveadkCAx/mtW8nWXA9bUjmyvWWuHOD +R8ETXGoGIeWaiy/d3rCxC5OPqzmAT/YxqfBuNeVEvUOnoYHuATuLo4c4kQIKh+m fsC8zZ8hkI490ObVnyho76SUsXsMUqBzljDvNQZMm8G82DxjOVaGQ4Ff4l+G2+0f zSNY2WTaNXs2ofdZiZCmBsB61/ti0lfv+d+Ug0v6qfBEmuJvPVIVQb/aYuPwu9Lg ljslT6CbEgH0XtUbtqi18dWU6q8YKgCeKaTdyPlkT5ESmA4mPAgTRkLxbXeTrUE= =HY3Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281