On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:24 AM Oliver Schode <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Sat, 18 May 2019 23:11:42 -0400
> Kenneth Parker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Did also see the following two:
> > >>
> > >> * How Linux Works, 2nd Edition (Paperback); Brian Ward; 2015..
> > >> Incidentally references systemd as one of the many topics covered.
> > >>
> > >
> > I'll  look, but this will, likely not have the detail I need.
>
> Nope, probably not. I read it a couple of years ago and Brian's book
> is huge, better still for a beginner I'd think. But if you're looking
> for something that roughly makes up for systemd's man pages, on paper,
> than this isn't it. I've been looking for one myself, no luck so far.
> About the best I might mention at this point is "Linux in Action" by
> David Clinton, Manning 2018, quite new. Be informed though it's more of
> your typical sysadmin guide: very broad in subject, goes into archiving,
> backups, hardening, webserver, devops, everything. Considering that,
> it's not particularly large, hence once again often lacking the depth.
> And then it doesn't have _a_ specific systemd part, or chapter; rather
> it's kind of smeared all over the place, perhaps as you might expect,
> a bit like systemd on Linux. ;)
>

Thanks.  The other Plus, about "Linux in Action", is that it's recent.

>
> I'm afraid, eventually there's (as yet) no replacement for the online
> manuals, and as drab as man pages can be, or whether you like systemd
> or not, I'd say the docs are quite decent. Not least considering its
> age. Almost overdone. If all free software was like that, we wouldn't
> need to kill too many trees.
>

I've been going over those Man Pages now (especially Systemctl and
systemd.*), and it's easy to get lost!

>
> Apart from that, and ongoing development, another hurdle could be that
> systemd is just too Linux specific, really.


One objection I'd like to add to the list is, "Systemd is not suited for
old, low-powered Hardware".  And one of my "Pet Projects", is using Linux
(and preferably Debian and/or Devuan) to rehabilitate old Hardware.

Here's a Bone for those reading this, who are "Anti SystemD":

https://ungleich.ch/en-us/cms/blog/2019/05/20/linux-distros-without-systemd/

What inspired me to bring this up on  *this*  List, is their First Entry:
Duvuan!  (I plan to get personally involved in the Devuan Project, mainly
to keep support for older Hardware, such as early i386 Processors, and
other Platforms, such as Power PC Chips [I own a G4 iMac "Desk Lamp", with
a bad hard drive, but otherwise good]).

And, by the way, I am, likely one of, only a few, who considers himself
"Neutral" on SystemD.  In fact, one of my "many Mottoes" is, "Neutrality
With Attitude"!  :-)

While even there clearly
> centered on the Desktop and enterprise environment. So while a book on
> the kernel is just about as relevant if you're doing Android, or Linux
> embedded, systemd isn't. Not to mention there haven't been a lot of
> titles on init scripting either.
>

Good Point.  I *definitely* plan to purchase the Kernel book, recommended
on an early part of this Thread.  And I'm getting it for *much* *more*,
than Systemd!  (Another thing I want to Master, is building my own,
personal Kernel, with Custom Options [not to mention small, because it
would have, only the Drivers and/only Modules, actually needed for my
Hardware]).

Best wishes,
> Oliver
>

Kenneth Parker
http://eyeblinkuniverse.com (Follow this, and its accompanying BLOG, to
find out more about me).
Note that I consider the Eye Blink Universe to be an Open Source Universe.

Reply via email to