Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeova...@gmail.com> writes: > > That webpage is unfortunately the best doc I have found on > SystemD. Its not unfortunate because it's bad doc, it's good but some > is a little out of date. It's that there is nothing better from the > makers of SystemD. In the ideal world only "us" system administrators > would care about SystemD and it wouldn't be an issue for others. But > SystemD is highly pervasive while being difficult to administer. Last > I saw, the Amazon AWS linux images had removed it, using SysV-style > init like the old days. > man systemd, follow the links in the SEE ALSO section. Really, is that so hard?
I can manage to teach this to complete newbies. An experienced sysadmin should have no excuse to complain about a shortage of documentation. (Although like OP I would *love* to have a dead tree version; but then again I *like* books) Mart -- "We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes." --- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.