Mark,
Does that mean you will agree to disagree, allowing the list to move on?
for my part the exchange is over. Others provided a list of possible
e-mail companies which was first, last, and only the goal for information
here.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 19/11/2019 18:37, Karen Lewellen wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Mark Rousell wrote:
What these pieces of software do need is to be hosted somewhere. The
easiest and best way for that to be done is to be hosted by an ISP or
email service provider. In other words, you simply obtain the webmail
service from the service provider of your choice.
No., I have to obtaine email from a service provider who is already
hosting their email with one of these options, configuring it to run
without JavaScript, and publicly stating in their description of the
email that it does as much.
Or, I simply try to use the service first, which is far more
productive than my getting detailed specifics on the webmail
software being used.
I'm not sure what you mean here. I seem to be running out of ways to
better explain what I have suggested. You seem to have a very fixed idea
of not only your goal but how you want to go about achieving it. I've
suggested a way to help you achieve your exact goal and I promise you
that what I have suggested is not some massive irrelevance but would
directly and precisely assist you in finding a suitable company.
This email, the one I am replacing, is for research. meaning I must
be able to direct people, in public libraries for example, into my inbox.
(a) Yes, what I am suggesting would allow for that.
(b) I would not recommend sharing an inbox or email account like this
but if you want to work this way then so be it. Nothing need change in
that respect.
Best done on a gmail comparative platform, not where I am having stuff
hosted privately or am hosting things privately.
Indeed, I have suggested using a platform that is (roughly) comparable
to Gmail. But only you can really establish what works for you.
I did not mention these details, because there will be a provider who
does what I need.
I agree. I have suggested ways that will assist you in finding such a
provider.
I have a perfectly useless one hosted via dreamhost via their webmail
software, a choice over which I could not influence their
decision...at all.
You are not required to influence their decision.
But here is my point, here is why I offered you a list of webmail
software: You say that Dreamhost's webmail offering is useless. So what
is their webmail software? It's not likely to be any better than the
very same software hosted at another service provider. So by knowing
what webmail software they use you can avoid wasting time testing
providers who host that same webmail software. Do you see now how and
why knowing what webmail software might work well for you will be
directly helpful in more efficiently finding a company whose webmail
offering works well for you?
Knowing my limits means I am not about to try hosting or having
someone else create a hosting structure.
Fair enough. As I said, installing your own choice of webmail software
in a web hosting account should only be seen as a fallback or secondary
approach. I understand it's over-complex for you.
But this still doesn't get away from it being very useful indeed for you
to know what webmail software will work well for you, so that you can
then find a company who hosts it. And that's all I have suggested. As I
also said, it is not mutually exclusive with trying out hosting
providers without first knowing what software they use.
--
Mark Rousell
