On Fri 19 Jun 2020 at 16:03:24 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > On Fri 19 Jun 2020 at 15:42:11 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:37:51PM +0100, Brian wrote: > > > > On Fri 19 Jun 2020 at 15:14:26 -0400, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > If we knew what you were talking about it would help. Link? > > > > > > If Eike is trying to start a social movement, this is... well, it's > > > something. But you'll need much broader exposure and more voices to > > > join yours, if you hope to prevail. > > > > Perhaps my question was too simple. I do not hope to prevail, just > > obtain clarification. But maybe "you" does not mean "me". > > True. I got lazy, and mixed together sentences that are addressing > both people in the cited material. Also, I didn't want to get into > the whole gendered pronoun issue. Not in such a short email. > > P.S. I'd consider "goodlist" and "badlist" as replacement terms. They're > short, both in terms of syllables and characters. Even shorter than the > originals! That's a good thing. "Allowlist" and "rejectlist" both add > a syllable, and the latter also adds characters.
Passlist and faillist, perhaps? Pass list already exists as a two word phrase, so people are used to saying it. Cheers, David.