El mar, 27 abr 2021 a las 10:35, David Wright (<deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk>) escribió: > > On Mon 26 Apr 2021 at 22:16:34 (-0400), Cmdte Alpha Tigre Z wrote: > > > > I saw at the Debian Lists' archive > > that my attached files were not > > shown as attached (as in the > > BTS archive), but instead as inserted > > into the body of the message. > > > > Is there some other way to attach > > the files correctly? > > Would it work and could I send the > > attachments with HTML? > > You might attach the shell script as application/x-sh rather > than text/x-sh¹. That should encode it, and display it as an > attachment on the web, as with: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/03/msg01494.html > > making it easier to download. And mutt, for example, would > display it via the attachment menu, ready for downloading. > > AIUI, the policy is to immediately display text/… attachments, > though mutt demarcates them better than firefox does. I suppose > one could always wrap the text file into a trivial shell script. > However, before doing this as a general policy, it's worth > checking that websites you expect to be archiving/forwarding > your posts are not stripping attachments. (Some do.) > > ¹ I have no idea how different MUAs, and posting sites like > gmail, would force this. Mutt does it as a matter of course, > and that can be checked before sending, by first postponing > the message, and then searching the contents of the Postponed > mailbox for "Content-Type: application/x-sh". > > Cheers, > David.
Thank you a lot, sir! Could you repost my attachments as replies to my tutorial that way, please? For now, I have no way of changing the content type for attachments. If you do so, please include also a short note in the body of your message like "Here are the attachments referred to in the tutorial." Thanks in advance. -- Time zone: GMT-4