On 16-08-2021 11:56, Jeremy Ardley wrote: > On 16/8/21 9:45 am, Weaver wrote: >> >> By reputation, the list is unmoderated, and that's the way it used to >> be. >> It still bears the token title of an unmoderated list but, in reality, a >> small collective of the politically correct have placed it under their >> auspices to moderate it. They have all the rationale, they believe, to >> do so, but this is quite in contradiction with the principles of open >> source, so it's an interesting phenomenon to observe. >> Cheers! >> >> Harry. > > Wait till you try and do any editing on Wikipedia, especially on > controversial topics. > > Then you'll find all about self appointed politically correct assholes > who by virtue of being there first have established an ecosystem where > anyone not toeing the line is neutered. > > I don't think this is accidental, and you can see clear signs of > continuous influence by major players using Wikipedia 'editors' to > further various agendas.
Yes, I do a lot of research, so need to cite frequently. I might reference Wikipedia, but never in isolation, and generally extract a quote, because that could change tomorrow. Any idiot can edit a page there. Cheers! Harry. -- `Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth'. -- Albert Einstein
