On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > Nano Nano([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > Question to all: I literally specify that you need automake 1.7 and > > autoconf 2.50: is that wise? > > I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2, > which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells > me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest > automake has aclocal-1.4. > > I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but > thats me.
There's a package automake1.7 in testing & sid. If you have both 1.4 and 1.7 installed, update-alternatives has 1.4 set as "best", but 1.7 is available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
