Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:47:53AM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Nano Nano([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:57:51PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > > I wondered about. I am running testing and have automake 1.4-p6-2, > > > > which is the latest version for testing/unstable, or so apt-get tells > > > > me. The ./proj fails because its looking for aclocal-1.7. The latest > > > > automake has aclocal-1.4. > > > > > > > > I won't go out to find an automake thats not a debian packgage, but > > > > thats me. > > > > > > I'm running SID. I expect you can edit the AMVER and ACVER in proj > > > and/or proj.c to the version numbers you have and it will work. (proj > > > is generated by running "gcc proj.c; ./a.out".) > > > > 'apt-get -s -t unstable install automake' says I have the latest version > > and I just did an update yesterday. So SID != unstable?? Thats what > > confused me. > > sid is unstable. Try the automake1.7 package; they have different names > so that you can install multiple versions in parallel.
:-( Why didn't I look at apt-cache search automake????? Looked at everything -but- that. Thanks Colin. My head was up and locked, where the Sun don't shine. Wayne -- The program is absolutely right; therefore the computer must be wrong. _______________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
