* Steve Lamb wrote (2004-02-07 00:12):
IE, name me one case where someone would set reply-to where they would not be able to also set From:.
Well, don't think inside a box. Not everyone use "modern email clients" (which are curiously not required to include either RFC support or useful functions like list-reply). I've seen a lot of people with mobile devices Replying-To their mail to some cheaper address to save expensive bandwith.
You mean like my Axim which has its From: set to my home address? The same address which has an extension on it which, when added, will send to my PDA in cases of emergency?
I'm not thinking inside the box. I simply don't see the need in any situation.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
