-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 09:41:11PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > The problem of _not_ enforcing use of smart hosts is that you've now got > viral spew from many point sources rather than a single point (or small > set of points) which can be reasonably filtered, monitored, and/or > controlled.
I'm not big on enforcing smarthosts. For one thing, my upstream couldn't run a mail server if it's life depended on it. So why eliminate small but working sites from being able to mail, forcing them to forward everything through broken sites? - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFALxm5UzgNqloQMwcRAnpEAKDSXd6HUoFhduZIlS26tH22CCggbwCfURw7 VOVvobPJ4gHfRaT1IrOBIg4= =0WdW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]