Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is sysfs going to replace procfs or something?
Not a replacement, an extension. Procfs was originally intended to be just for the processor-related info, I think, and slowly it got added more features (like disk info, system info etc). With sysfs, anything that doesn't belong to procfs will go there. -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
