On 24. March 2004 at 12:48PM -0500, "Derrick 'dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > So, to summarize : > . udev is dynamaic management of /dev along the lines of devfs > . udev is purely userspace (no kernel module or driver) > . therefore the naming scheme is defined purely in userspace, > not in the kernel [...] Would installing udev have any (harmful) effect on a 2.4 system, or would is just be ignored? I'm "trialing" 2.6 on a regular 2.4 system (lots of unresolved hardware issues yet on 2.6 like poor tv and no lirc support). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]