I demostrate how one can start to distribute a program, continue to distribute a program and stop to distribute a program. All three actions do not contradict any ethical rule.
If you still think that erasing something from my hard drive (free or non-free) is not ethical, please explain me how.
I just don't see what this has to do with having debian remove non-free.
Sure, you can remove something from your hard drive. That's not equivalent to removing packages in unstable which are there because of someone else's work.
I understand what you are talking about. There are Debain developers who want Debian to act always ethical, and there are Debian developers who think it is O.K. to act non-ethical for Debian, for example because of the work they contribute to non-free.
First group will be disappointed if non-free distribution will be continued by Debian. Second group will be disappointed if non-free distribution will not be discontinued.
As you see there is no way to satisfy everyone. That's way Debian has voting system to satisfy majority.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
