I understand what you are talking about. There are Debain developers who want Debian to act always ethical, and there are Debian developers who think it is O.K. to act non-ethical for Debian, for example because of the work they contribute to non-free.
I feel somewhat insulted there. So me making a non-free package is
non-ethical ? so, when I help other to have the ocaml documentation
well integrated to there debian documentation system (dwww for
example), I'm acting non-ethical ?
I DO NOT AGREE THAT THIS IS THE CASE.
You misunderstood. Creating, using, distributing non-free does not make you immideately non-ethical. It does not make you non-ethical later. It just compel you to act non-ethical later, not always and not necesserelly.
One who make an ethical action and non-ethical later reduce the amount of good he does (by the amount of bad). By stopping to distribute non-free we will not increase amount of good. We will decrease the amount of bad.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
