Hello Manoj, On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:31:14AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2003 22:43:59 +0200, Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > > - 2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement R any options other > > - than the default option which do not receive at least R votes > > - ranking that option above the default option are dropped from > > - consideration. > > + 2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement R, and less then R votes > > are > > + cast, the entire vote is thrown out. The amendment may be > > withdrawn, > > + or a discussion period may be resumed at the sponsor's discretion. > > > I think I like this change. > > ... this amendment is superfluous, since if less than R > votes are cast, then no option gets R votes, so all options are > discarded, and the vote is invalidated anyway.
Sorry, but I think your logic here is strange. Why do you think that the amendment is superfluous? Do you claim that you version and John's version are the same? Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
pgplLf8oluCic.pgp
Description: PGP signature