On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > We don't provide security support for non-free, to my knowledge.
We have infrastructure for it, we don't make use of it at the moment. > I believe most (if not all) of the other issues could be solved by > running an Alioth-like service. I don't think Debian running an Alioth-like service would be any better than anyone else running an Alioth-like service (ie, it'd have all the same benefits and problems as nonfree.org). Am I wrong? > I proposed that several times on this list, but never got a feedback. Is > this so far off? Or so clear without ambiguity? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
