also sprach Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.10.0455 +0100]: > Formally, the Debian Project will include in the main section of > its distribution works licensed under the GNU Free Documentation > License that include no Invariant Sections, no Cover Texts, no > Acknowledgements, and no Dedications, unless permission to remove > them is granted.
I'm a late entry to the thread, please excuse. If we kicked all GFDL out of main, how many upstreams would reconsider their choice of licence? None? Few? Some? Many? I am <-> that short of seconding dato's proposal, but I believe that Debian is also in a position to make the world a better place by asking upstreams to rethink. Or am I being completely naïve here? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "gilmour's guitar sounds good whether you've got a bottle of cider in your hand or a keyboard and a mouse." -- prof. bruce maxwell
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)