On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:25:54 +0100, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Russ Allbery [Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:17:14 -0800]: >> If we're going to put all the options on the ballot, let's go ahead >> and put them *all* on the ballot so that no significant group of >> DDs can later claim that their opinion wasn't represented by the >> choices. > Latelly, I'm thinking that this (in a similar fashion to Manoj's > mail) is the best option. The only problem I see is that Manoj's > mail seems to want to attach a position statement to each option, > and that can be divisive. I'm starting to see the benefits of a > prior vote... I think I was partially responding to aj's question about why we need it to be two separate GR's. At this point, we can have either 2 GR's -- one for deciding on the status of GFDL licensed works, with or without invariant sections, and a second one for position statements --- or conflate them. manoj -- Tis man's perdition to be safe, when for the truth he ought to die. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]