Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> To interpret the DFSG to read into it language about functional parts >> or to have different standards for programs and documentation, is to >> insert something that is simply not there. > > I do not interpret DFSG that way. If I decide to create a package > with some essays from www.gnu.org that package would be free acording > to FSF and non-free acording to DFSG (because these essays are not > modifiable). I have no problems with that.
How *do* you interpret the DFSG then? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
