Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Christopher Martin] >> If an issue is highly controversial, then I can think of no better >> way of settling it in a way that most developers will accept than a >> vote. People respect votes much more than decrees, even if they don't >> agree with them. > > And yet in this very thread we *still* have people whinging about GR > 2004-03 being "deceptive". (Yes, *after* you all had the opportunity > in 2004-04 to repeal it, and didn't do so.) Either astounding or > depressing.
Has anyone come forward and said "I was deceived by GR 2004-03"? I wonder. I don't recall anyone saying that. This makes the deception claim all the worse. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]