* Anton Zinoviev [Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:18:59PM +0200]: > > > The strong point of the second notion of freedom is that 1. this > > > freedom is all we need for practical purposes (thats why FSF holds > > > this notion of freedom) and 2. this is the status quo in Debian. > > > > The problem with this second notion is that "practical purposes" is > > ill-defined. > > What do you mean by "ill-defined"?
I mean that what you mean by "practical purposes" is not necessarily the same as what I do. Most objections to the GFDL have been backed up by what the objectors to the GFDL consider practical purposes. I think that what purposes I consider practical is key to define what I consider free, and that "all the freedom we need for practical purposes" is a mere restatement of the obvious. Hope I made it clearer now. It seems to me I'm more or less paraphrasing things that have already been said here, so I'll stop now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]