Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:15:08 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> And then, has nobody ever raised the rumor that the purpose of this "GFDL >> is non-free" hullaboo is just to make sure that we will have our non-free >> section, for ever? > > I feel it the same way.
The same as who? Surely not as me. I should have added some irony indicators. > The fact that people expressed the opinion that Debian doesn't > consider non-free software as antisocial and unethical scares me a > lot. There are several reasons why people "are for" Free Software, and for sure not all of them imply that any non-free software is antisocial or, even more, unethical. I am glad that Debian does not fix itself to a specific ideologic motivation *why* we produce a Free operating system, but instead confines itself to an practical definition of what Free Software means. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)