Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le mercredi 23 août 2006 à 09:48 +0100, Enrico Zini a écrit :
4. determines that for the purposes of DFSG #2, device firmware
shall also not be considered a program.
I'd personally prefer the 4th point to read:
4. determines that for the purposes of DFSG #2, device firmware
shall also not be considered a program until it will become practical
to do so.
I like the idea, but I think it could be better worded.
How about:
4. Determines that as a special exception to DFSG #2, source code for
device firmware will not be required until we have the technical means
to split them out in a convenient way for our users.
(Not perfect either :/ )
Seconded.
This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in
non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
