On Wed, Aug 23, 2006, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > This is a good proposition, as it does not allow firmwares already in > > non-free (eg madwifi) to go into main. > Madwifi contains non-free code that runs inside the kernel on the host > processor. Whatever the project's opinion on firmware, madwifi is > clearly non-free.
Yes, that's why we (including Aurélien) want to keep it in non-free. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
