On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:56:21 +0200, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 11:49, Steve Langasek wrote: >> I agree with Don. If this proposal is going to go to a vote, it >> should go to a vote separately from the votes about exceptions, so >> that we can get a clear answer to the exception question without >> the outcome being tainted by either voter confusion leading to >> strategic voting, or orthogonal statements that are widely >> supported by the community but which tell us nothing about what we >> should do for etch. > I can agree that the vote should be separate from the exceptions for > Etch. However, I do not think Don's proposal should stand on its > own without amendments or counter-proposals and that was the main > point of my objection. Do you have an amendment to Don's proposal in mind? manoj -- Revenge is a form of nostalgia. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]