Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> While I'm at it, it would probably be fun to implement a 'higher is better'
> ranking parser in a way to allow someone to vote for example
> 13-53-32-5-1-_-3-2-2-_-1. Yet, that would probably confuse voters if they
> were comparing that vote with a vote like 12-24-23-7-2-1-5-3-3-1-2 -
> because those two different votes would be considered equal in the eyes
> of the parser script.
I like this idea, with the addition of the acknowledgement containing a
normalised vote.
13-53-32-5-1-_-3-2-2-_-1 => 6-8-7-5-2-1-4-3-3-1-2
12-24-23-7-2-1-5-3-3-1-2 => 6-8-7-5-2-1-4-3-3-1-2
--
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] because [EMAIL PROTECTED] is broken.
http ((((
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[
as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html ((((
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
