Josip Rodin wrote: > > While I'm at it, it would probably be fun to implement a 'higher is better' > ranking parser in a way to allow someone to vote for example > 13-53-32-5-1-_-3-2-2-_-1. Yet, that would probably confuse voters if they > were comparing that vote with a vote like 12-24-23-7-2-1-5-3-3-1-2 - > because those two different votes would be considered equal in the eyes > of the parser script.
I like this idea, with the addition of the acknowledgement containing a normalised vote. 13-53-32-5-1-_-3-2-2-_-1 => 6-8-7-5-2-1-4-3-3-1-2 12-24-23-7-2-1-5-3-3-1-2 => 6-8-7-5-2-1-4-3-3-1-2 -- John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] because [EMAIL PROTECTED] is broken. http (((( WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[ as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html (((( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]