On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:41:38 -0700, John H Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Josip Rodin wrote: >> >> While I'm at it, it would probably be fun to implement a 'higher is >> better' ranking parser in a way to allow someone to vote for >> example 13-53-32-5-1-_-3-2-2-_-1. Yet, that would probably confuse >> voters if they were comparing that vote with a vote like >> 12-24-23-7-2-1-5-3-3-1-2 - because those two different votes would >> be considered equal in the eyes of the parser script. > I like this idea, with the addition of the acknowledgement > containing a normalised vote. > 13-53-32-5-1-_-3-2-2-_-1 => 6-8-7-5-2-1-4-3-3-1-2 > 12-24-23-7-2-1-5-3-3-1-2 => 6-8-7-5-2-1-4-3-3-1-2 This is not something I am personally interested in doing. I do think that ballot normalization is an interesting idea, though again, not something I feel like coding. manoj -- The Devil can cite scripture for his purpose. Shakespeare, Merchant of Venice Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]