On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:53:25 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> * Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 22:27]:
>> * Andreas Barth:
>> 
>>>  So, I would replace your 2. with the current text, and your
>>>  3. with: 
>>>  3. During any DPL term, the DPL might appoint up to two
>>>  new members unilaterally. He might replace an existing member, or
>>>  add them as additional members at his choice, provided the maximum
>>> number of eight members is not exceeded.
>> 
>> This is ambiguous.  Can the DPL replace two members or just one?

> I thought of two - do you have a better text available.

"[The DPL] might replace existing members ..."?  You're already using
plural when you say "...add them..."

>> (And, BTW, does the Constitution make gender assumptions WRT to the
>> DPL in other places? 8-)

> s/He/The DPL/

-- 
Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA         http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to