* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080317 00:24]: > > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]: > > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > > The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for > > > > number of emails on threads on a issue raised, number of emails sent to > > > > the bug report, number of "fact finding" or "research" or survey or > > > > report mails in that mix. > > > > > > Quite right: that's why I suggested that if someone has failed to vote > > > or contribute twice, they should be replaceable at the option of the > > > DPL. > > > > I would prefer if people would fix their release goal / critical bugs > > instead of preparing complex arguments how to change the tech ctte at > > places where it is not broken. > > I see; so there are no members of the technical committee who have > failed twice to vote?
I'm not sure how not voting twice in a row makes someone a less important contributor by definition. But I would really prefer if you would fix your own packages instead of relaying on our BSPers. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]