On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I see; so there are no members of the technical committee who have > > failed twice to vote? > > I'm not sure how not voting twice in a row makes someone a less > important contributor by definition.
I see; so what number do you think would be wise? Two was just a starting point; I'm not wedded to that. How many votes or conversations should a member be able to miss before it is clear he or she is not participating reliably enough? What do you think about the three-month suggestion? If that's a bad time limit, what would be a better one? > But I would really prefer if you would fix your own packages instead of > relaying on our BSPers. I'm not sure how this is relevant to the tech ctte. Can you explain it? Maybe we should have BSPers for the tech-ctte, so that if the committee is too busy in a particular week other people can step in and do that work. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
