On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:42:30AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > As 2K developers have now seconded this GR, and the GR itself calls for > > a suspension of a Delegate's decision, an immediate procedural vote is > > called for if the decision is to stand while the GR process is followed, > > as per 4.2.2 of the constitution. > > > > For reference, this will now not take place, as the original GR has been > amended to not include the decision reversal text.
I find it mildly entertaining that this vote did not take place because apparently it takes "a couple of days, [...] and sometimes longer" [0] to set up an "immediate" vote. I'm sure there were very good reasons [1] to not rush things in this particular case. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00203.html [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00226.html Cheers. -- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
