On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 08:54:17AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Let me observe that the fact that "several people here think" is not > authoritative. > > That said, I disagree with point (ii) of your interpretation: > > > i Do we require source for firmware in main: Yes > > ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs: No > > iii What do we do for Lenny: Wait > > iV Do we modify foundation documents: No > > v Do we override foundation documents No > > it should rather be "Yes":
Instead of having a long, useless discussion on what "Further discussion" means, would it be possible to remove that option? Correct me if I am wrong, but I think for any interpretation of what "Further Discussion" would mean in this vote, there's an explicit option in the ballot. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]