On Sun, Apr 12 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:

> Le Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx a Ă©crit :
>> It seems that devotee does not properly handle it.

        Devotee follows the standards. That means RFC 2440 or RFC
 3156. If you can point me to an RFC the said vote followed, I'll
 see that it gets support.

        This was PEBKAC.

> at worse, there may be alternatives, like selectricity (.org), which was also
> made by a DD.

> Unfortunately, it is not packaged…

        And it does not do LDAP checks. Nor does it follow the
 constitution as  for quorum and majority reqs. By the time you hack
 that in and verify it ...

        manoj
-- 
Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, half shut afterwards. Benjamin
Franklin
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to