Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > I think unlimited upload access should be simply another one of those sets > of permissions that some people have and others don't. Those who need > that access to do their work can receive it after appropriate vetting of > their ability to use that access appropriately, just as someone would > volunteer to join ftp-master, or DSA, or keyring-maint, or the Lintian > maintenance team and would, after appropriate vetting, be given additional > privileges to do that work.
In your vision of things, who would be responsible for granting these privileges and judging whether someone can be trusted to have them? I think our current model of giving all DDs access to the whole archive if they successfully complete NM works. We have procedures to deal with abuse, and we have tools to review the work of others (like the PTS, lintian.d.o, etc). Why move to a culture of having to ask permission? In my opinion, it's very valuable that any DD can decide out of the blue to go on a RC bug fixing spree if they happen to have the time, as some have done in the past. Thanks, -- Romain Francoise <rfranco...@debian.org> http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739tau40g....@elegiac.orebokech.com
