On 2013-03-25 09:55, Thomas Goirand wrote:
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of
the
people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing anything?
I might be able to answer more clearly if you narrowed down what teams
(if any) you are thinking of. I guess that you are primarily thinking
of the major technical teams that are already delegations? In that
case:
- I don't think that delegations to our technical teams should be
"political" matters, so I think there should be a very clear desire for
it from the project before a new DPL removes existing delegates at the
start of a DPL term. I currently don't see any case where I would want
to do that, though you are of course free to try to persuade me that it
is needed.
- In some teams I perceive there to be a shortage of available
time/energy, and therefore additional delegates might be useful, but
again that's not something where I would want to jump in and delegate my
own preferred candidate(s) on day one. It would be rather
counterproductive to take such action before working with the teams in
question, as it would be likely to reduce the time/energy provided from
existing team members.
In my platform I wrote about some things that I think Debian teams
need. Clearly I don't think that every team is doing all these things
perfectly yet, or I wouldn't be focusing on this topic, but my
suggestions for improving how our teams work are ones that I think any
team members could follow, and aren't intended to require changing team
memberships.
--
Moray
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/874a0c8ed0347b20be33f7db69d99...@www.morayallan.com