Joerg Jaspert dijo [Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:36:25AM +0100]: > Where do they decide the global direction for the project? They have a > technical decision to do. Sure it has a wide impact, but global > direction is something different than "just" an init thingie. > > > Also, seeing how much involvement we have in votes usually, I am far more > happy to have a small group of people invest a lot of time to get to > know all the various edges of all the involved systems and making an > informed decision based on that, giving us long reasonings WHY they > decided the way they did, > > than having a vote where a few hundred CAN vote, way less than that > usually DO vote, and even less really inform themself of WHAT they vote > on. Sure, there may be some who go long ways to get all the details, but > I could bet their number is SMALL, especially if you look at, eg., how > deep TC members like Russ went into the issue. > > The quality of the decision will be much better with the CTTE.
I doubt I can state my opinion in a clearer way than what Ganeff has stated here. I'm completely with him — No good will come from rehashing the argument in a project-wide fashion once again.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
