On 25/03/14 at 07:21 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > For opening RAR 3.0 archives, you can replace rar with unar these days.
Nice; if it really works with all RAR 3.0 archives, it might be worth updating the unrar-free package description, which currently says: Description-en: Unarchiver for .rar files Unrar can extract files from .rar archives. Can't handle some archives in the RAR 3.0 format, only the non-free "unrar" package can do that. > In practice almost everyone has non-free in their sources.list due to > most firmware being non-free. Also most developers will have non-free > in their sources.list due to various GNU documentation being in > non-free. Also most users will have non-free in their sources.list due > to things like Flash. At DebConf we discussed adding additional > sub-components (non-free/docs non-free/hw non-free/web non-free/games > etc) for different purposes. People needing specific classes of > non-free software could then enable just those subclasses that they > need. I think this would help in addition to your suggestion. Indeed. Lucas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
