On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 27/03/14 at 20:38 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 10:32 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > > Nice; if it really works with all RAR 3.0 archives, it might be worth > > > updating the unrar-free package description, which currently says: > > > > > > Description-en: Unarchiver for .rar files > > > Unrar can extract files from .rar archives. Can't handle some archives in > > > the RAR 3.0 format, only the non-free "unrar" package can do that. > > > > Wrong package, you are looking at unrar not unar. > > No, I'm saying that, if unar can open all RAR 3.0 archives, the > unrar-free package description should probably be updated to point to > unar rather than unrar.
If unar can open all rar-archives, why not drop unrar and unrar-nonfree from the archives? That way we'd be rid of one crippled and one non-free package, all in one fell swoop :) Kind regards, David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <t...@debian.org> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140327164937.gn25...@hirohito.acc.umu.se
