On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:06:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >What we could try to do, though, is to make the yearly election process >more efficient. Currently, it spans over 6 weeks, with one week for >nominations, 3 for compaigning, and 2 for voting. We could reduce that >to 3/4 weeks, with: >- election-3 weeks: deadline for nomination (without an explicit start of > nomination period, other than a mail from the secretary announcing the > general planning of the election) >- from election-3w to election-1w: campaign >- then, one week for voting. > >The 3-week campaign period is longer than our default discussion period >for GRs (2 weeks). I don't think that there's much to gain by having an >additional week here. > >The 2-week voting period made sense when the Constitution was written, >as intermittent internet access was much more likely back then. But >today, it's probably less justified.
Do you want to disenfranchise DDs who are on vacation? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Is there anybody out there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140328132413.ga25...@einval.com