On 28/03/14 at 13:24 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:06:00AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > >What we could try to do, though, is to make the yearly election process > >more efficient. Currently, it spans over 6 weeks, with one week for > >nominations, 3 for compaigning, and 2 for voting. We could reduce that > >to 3/4 weeks, with: > >- election-3 weeks: deadline for nomination (without an explicit start of > > nomination period, other than a mail from the secretary announcing the > > general planning of the election) > >- from election-3w to election-1w: campaign > >- then, one week for voting. > > > >The 3-week campaign period is longer than our default discussion period > >for GRs (2 weeks). I don't think that there's much to gain by having an > >additional week here. > > > >The 2-week voting period made sense when the Constitution was written, > >as intermittent internet access was much more likely back then. But > >today, it's probably less justified. > > Do you want to disenfranchise DDs who are on vacation?
What about those who go on vacation without internet access for two weeks, currently? Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140328135128.gb3...@xanadu.blop.info
