Le mercredi, 19 novembre 2014, 00.12:27 Neil McGovern a écrit : > > Even if it were as ready, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have > > a > > separate GR. Voting once instead of twice is nice for everyone, but > > conflating two separate decisions in a single GR has been proven to > > be unwise in the past. And I'm especially wary of doing so with a > > constitutional change. Secretary: can you share your thoughts on > > this last point with us, what would be best from the ballot > > preparation POV? > If you think you want this as a separate option, I would suggest an > amendment to your original text and not accepting it. This way people > could (with condorcet) choose between the two.
That doesn't work if people want to vote on change A and change B independently, unless the ballot becomes: * only A * only B * B & A … at which point two votes in sequence make more sense, IMHO. OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5661362.pdqW3v9eEL@gyllingar
